Skip to content
Physics3 min read

Scientists Study Rare Quark Decays to Test Physics Theories

Research groups presented new data on a rare particle transition that might not match current physics predictions. The evidence comes from a single conference presentation and remains far from conclusive.

In short: Research groups presented new data on a rare particle transition that might not match current physics predictions. The evidence comes from a single conference presentation and remains far from conclusive.

Physicists look at extremely rare particle events to see if the basic rules of the universe need an update.

What happened, in plain words

Scientists from the CMS and LHCb Collaborations presented new research at the International Conference on High Energy Physics. They looked at a rare process where a beauty quark changes into a strange quark, a muon, and an antimuon. CMS studied six types of these decays at the same time using a larger set of data from the third run of the Large Hadron Collider. LHCb looked at one specific decay type using data from earlier runs. Both groups found small differences when comparing their measurements to current theoretical predictions.

Key points

  • Studying rare quark transitions: Researchers look at how one type of quark turns into another to test the Standard Model of particle physics.
  • Simultaneous analysis by CMS: CMS examined six decay types at once, allowing researchers to handle background signals and uncertainties consistently.
  • New data and triggers: CMS used a larger data sample from the third run of the LHC and a new trigger to measure branching fractions with low statistical uncertainty.
  • Model-independent measurement by LHCb: LHCb measured the angles of resulting particles for a specific neutral beauty meson decay without making theoretical assumptions about the inside of the decay.

Terms explained

  • Quark — A tiny fundamental piece of matter that combines to build larger particles like protons and neutrons. Example: Think of quarks like Lego blocks that snap together in different ways to make larger building blocks.
  • Standard Model — The main scientific theory that describes the fundamental particles and forces in the universe. Example: Think of it as the ultimate rulebook that scientists use to explain how subatomic matter behaves.
  • Branching fraction — The probability that a specific particle will decay in a particular way. Example: Think of it like rolling a multi-sided dice and tracking how often a specific number shows up.
  • Muon — An elementary particle similar to an electron but much heavier. Example: Think of it as a heavier cousin to the ordinary electrons that flow through electrical wires.

Critical analysis

What is encouraging. The research brings together simultaneous analyses of multiple decay types and new data collection tools, which helps researchers handle background signals and uncertainties more consistently than before.

What deserves caution:

  • Conference presentation without final papers. The findings were shared at a conference rather than as fully reviewed journal publications. This means the scientific community has not yet thoroughly vetted every detail of the analysis.
  • Small and inconclusive differences. The differences between the predicted measurements and the actual observations are small. The source explicitly notes that these findings are far from conclusive.
  • Reliance on specific models and past runs. Some parts of the research rely on data from earlier LHC runs or specific modeling choices. Researchers still need to incorporate newer run data into all parts of the measurements to see if the hints hold up.

Bottom line: New measurements of rare quark decays show small differences from standard predictions, but researchers emphasize that the findings are not yet conclusive.

What we still don't know

The source does not provide final proof of undiscovered particles, and the observed differences remain small and uncertain. Researchers have not yet applied the newest run data to all of the specific decay measurements discussed.


Based on reporting from CERN. This is an independent explainer, written in our own words with AI assistance; CERN has not reviewed or endorsed it. Read the original for the full details.